We received this email from one Maxwell Chetterston, who expressed grave concern about our validity as “professional automotive journalists”. Lmao alright dude:

Dear so called Assholes,

I have read through the sorry excuse for a humorous website, and I have many grievances with the affront to my eyes that I’ve had to behold. However, chiefly I have a major concern about your journalistic integrity. Mainly, I do wonder if you at Mis-Shift Into My Arse have in fact driven an Aston Martin Valkyrie.

I have in fact driven several and believe you haven’t described several key details of driving the car. For one, the annoying whine of the transmission at lower RPM is a really bother to anyone who is familiar with the Valkyrie, lest you wear the headset. And you negated to mention just how uncomfortable the Aston Martin’s headset is on long drives. You also did not once mention just how poorly it fails at being a motorcar. I drive a 2006 Mercedes SLK250, and that is 2000 times the car of the Valkyrie in every way important to being an automobile. The cabin is far too cramped, the seats are fixed, there is a terrible ruckus in the car like it’s a £3.000.000 Rover, the steering wheel controls are too complex, the A pillars create an awful blind spot, and THERE IS NO STORAGE SPACE ANYWHERE!!! THAT IS A CRUCIAL DETAIL TO INFORM THE BUYING PUBLIC ABOUT!!

Finally, you negated to mention to shear stupidity of the camera based rear view system. The screens are very hard to see for those with bad eyes, and I find them to be extremely distracting to borderline nauseating.

Please address your lack of detail in such articles. This is misleading to the buying public into thinking cars like the Valkyrie may be good for everyday use, and it is up to watchdogs like myself to ensure that journalistic integrity is upheld. There may be future legal consequences if changes are not made.

Disrespectfully,

Maxwell Chetterston

Get Outlook for iOS